Fetal scalp electrodes of various designs are used widely for continuous
intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Minor lacerations of the scalp are
common and 1.0 -4.5% of infants may develop scalp ulceration or abscess.' 'We
describe two cases in which there was penetration of the subarachnoid space
with leakage of cerebrospinal fluid associated with the use of a scalp
electrode of the single helix type.
Case
reports
Case 1-A 20-year-old primigravida
was admitted in spontaneous labour at 38 weeks of gestation. A fetal scalp
electrode was applied at 4 cm cervical dilatation with the fetal head in the
left occipitoanterior position. Spontaneous vaginal delivery of a 'nature boy
weighing 3130 g occurred four hours later. The baby was in good condition with
Apgar scores of 9 and 10 at one and five minutes respectively. Three hours
after delivery we noted leakage of clear cerebrospinal fluid from the scalp
electrode site over the posterior fontanelle. Conservative treatment with a dry
dressing, prophylactic antibiotics, and nursing of the baby in a sitting
position resulted in resolution of the link within 48 hour without any apparent
complications.
Case 2-A 20-year-old
primigravida was admitted in spontaneous labour at 39 weeks. A fetal scalp
electrode was applied at 3 cm cervical dilatation with the fetal head in the
right occipitoanterior position. Spontaneous vaginal delivery of a mature girl
weighing 3050 g occurred seven hours later. The baby was in good condition with
Apgar scores of 9 and 10 at one and five minutes. Routine examination after
birth disclosed leakage of dear fluid from
the electrode
site over the right parietal bone, 2~5 cm behind the posterior edge of the
anterior fontanelle. As in case I there was rapid resolution of the leak (in
this case within 24 hours) without any neurological complications. The position
of the injury suggested that there had been penetration or both bone and dura
resulting in the leak.

Fetal scalp hair
and tissue entrapped between electrode wire and plastic body of device.
Comment
Penetrating
injuries of the skull may lead to infection and meningitis and to intracranial
haemorrhage due to vascular injury. There may be a long-term risk of epilepsy due
to cortical injury and scarring.
In each of these
two cases the electrode was applied without difficulty by an experienced
midwife. In one the application was unsatisfactory as it was over the posterior
fontanelle, but in the other the application was in an ideal position over the
parietal bone. Our staff have reported several instances of difficulty in
removing these electrodes, and we think that the injuries were sustained during
removal rather than application.
There are two
important design features of the single helix electrode, which contribute to
the difficulty of removal. Firstly, the attachment of the helical electrode
wire close to the perimeter of the plastic body causes the axis of rotation of
the electrode to be indeterminate and variable during both application and
removal. Secondly, the narrow angle of insertion of the electrode wire into the
plastic body creates a wedge within which fetal scalp hair and tissue may
become entrapped (figure). The effect of these design features is such that any
traction applied to the electrode during its removal may cause the wire to
straighten and thereby increase its potential depth of penetration. Any
oscillating rotation, which may be used to free the electrode, carries the risk
of deeper penetration of the tip through the fetal scalp. We think that this is
the most likely mechanism for the penetration of the parietal bone in case 2.
In view of these
potentially serious injuries we believe that the use of the single helix scalp
electrode should he abandoned in favour of either the double helix or Copeland
pattern, whose design features prevent the type of injuries that we desaibe.3
1 Ashkenazi S, Metzker A, Merlob P, Ovadia 3, Reisner SH. Scalp changes
after fetal monitoring. Arch Dis, Child 1985;80:267-9.
2 Okada DM, Chow AW. Neonatal scalp abscess following intra-partum fetal
monitoring: prospective comparison of two spiral electrodes. Am 3 Obstet Gynecol 1977127 :S75-8.
3 Department of Health and Social Security. Helical foetal scalp
electrodes. DHSS Safety I14ormation
Bulletin 1985, No 21.
(Accepted
17thJnly 1985)
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Manchester General
Hospital, Crumpsall, Manchester MS 6RB
D S SHARP, Ma, MRCOG, consultant
obstetrician
J M COURIEL, Ma, MRCP, consultant paediatrician
Correspondence to: Mr Sharp.BMJ/ 1546/85/A
================================================================================